"With the third negative study published in just 51 days…."
Stop. Right there. How have these so-called replication studies been handled so far? Does the fact that THREE of them have been "completed" in just 51 days ring any bells? It should. It smacks of hurried, slap-dash, agenda-driven pseudoscience….the type that occurs when we hold to the concept that "science is a social effort", and not that science is, er, science.
Thanks everyone for sharing all xmrv replication information as it occurs. The community IS the lifeline.